Galaxy Magazine Home
     AUTHORS
     Kevin J Anderson
     Rebecca Moesta
     Gregory Benford
     David Brin
     Ben Bova
     Orson Scott Card
     Mark Chartrand
     Mike Cote
     Jack Dann
     Vincent Di Fate
     Jeff Duntemann
     Tom Easton
     Harlan Ellison
     Michael Fossel
     DC Fontana
     Chris Fountain
     David Gerrold
     Karen Haber
     Joe Haldeman
     Lynn Harper
     Robert Heinlein
     Anne McCaffrey
     Elizabeth Malartre
     James Oberg
     Mike Resnick
     Spider Robinson
     Bruce H Rogers
     Ken Rose
     Rudy Rucker
     Kristine K Rusch
     Pamela Sargent
     Robert Silverberg
     Robert Skotak
     Bjo Trimble
     John Varley
     Bill Warren
     Len Wein
     Pual Witcover
     George Zebrowski
    



Galaxyonline.com                            Galaxy.TV






Karen Haber

Interview with Lynette Cook Q&A with the Creator of Worlds

Lynette Cook deserves our respect. How many artists do you know who get up in the morning and create a world? Cook specializes in painting astronomical illustrations, particularly things unseen: extrasolar planets light years distant whose existence is often confirmed by the merest wobble of a star's orbit in an astronomer's telescope.  Despite its high-tech subject, hers is an anachronistic art in the tradition of illustrators who once filled newspapers and magazines with images before photography was available. Even in this digitalized age, we rely on the old-fashioned medium of paint to evoke the wonders at the edge of our galaxy. Cook comes well-equipped for the job, with a double degree in art and  science, and a day job at the Morrison Planetarium in San Francisco. Most  recently, in a painting seen 'round the world, she provided our first glimpse of extrasolar planet HD 209458. Among Cook's many previous creations was the infamous-in-certain-circles Periodic Table of Chocolate. She reports that the best part of that job was that she could eat most of what she painted.

Q: HOW DOES IT FEEL TO LITERALLY CREATE WORLDS, PAINTING SOMETHING WE'VE NEVER SEEN BEFORE?
A: On one hand it's nicer for me because in scientific illustration, if you're illustrating something that you have lots of data for, it's so easy for someone to tell you you've got it wrong. I may paint a distant world we've never seen before, but it has to be based on fact if it's based on a real discovery. Of course, I can also use my imagination because there's so much that we don't know about it. And that really is the fun part.

Q: WHY DO YOU DO SPACE ART?
A: Because there was demand for it, and that's where my career led me. I  was a good student in both science and art, but I felt I did art better. I  don't retain factual information as well as more subjective kinds of information. I don't have a photographic memory, and I realized that I just am a little better with artistic, creative kinds of things. But I love the science, I'm fascinated by it, and it just seemed logical to try to find a way to do both.

Q: IS THERE ANY OVERLAP BETWEEN SCIENTIFIC ILLUSTRATION AND SCIENCE FICTION ILLUSTRATION?
A: Definitely. And at times I'm a part of that. Certainly I think SF art is fascinating. There's a lot of great art work out there. I think it makes people dream and wonder. I'm all for it.

Q: ARE YOU MORE SCIENTIST OR FANTASIST? 
A: Well, both, although most of the images that I do, that straddle the  line, are few and far between. When I do a piece of work it's usually with the intention that it has to be accurate because it's based on actual research, or that it can be more conceptual or fanciful because I'm trying to get across a scientific idea rather than depict an actual world as it might exist. I don't really think that's clear to the viewer. Especially if they're more science-fiction-oriented, they'll probably respond to it on an emotional level because of the imagery or the colors. I don't think they're that concerned with the facts, necessarily, unless they're an astronomer. 

Q: HOW DO YOUR PAINTINGS EVOLVE? HOW DO YOU SELECT YOUR MEDIA? 
A: Obviously I can't do any direct observation. Most of what I'm depicting can't even be seen through a normal visible means. The extrasolar planets, for example, except for the last discovery, were only detected through finding a wobble in the star. So we can't photograph those and, clearly, looking through a telescope isn't going to help me. So I obtain my information by talking to the astronomers themselves about what they think they would look like. I try to keep up on these discoveries. I do sometimes visit observatories but I'm not exactly painting on scene.  Sometimes I'll have an image in my mind's eye of what I want to do with  it, and then it's just a matter of sitting down and doing a sketch and, if  it's an extrasolar planet, running it past one of my astronomer colleagues  for approval. Sometimes I go through my picture file for images, something that triggers my imagination. Sometimes the astronomers themselves will give me an idea, something that they think would be really nice in a painting based on some information they know about the planet, like its distance from a star or its size. And I'm also playing around a little bit with the Bryce computer program. That makes alien landscapes. As for media, I know what combination of media to use. I don't want to experiment. I'm inventing worlds. I don't want to have to invent media, too.

Q: HOW DO YOU CHOOSE COLORS FOR SUBJECTS THAT YOU'VE NEVER SEEN?
A: Most of the extrasolar planets are several Jupiter masses and we think they would probably be similar to Jupiter in appearance. Obviously, we know what Jupiter looks like. To a large degree it's a matter of doing a planet that's like Jupiter but not Jupiter. So the colors can be similar. Now it could have rings. We don't know for sure. All of the gas giants in our solar system have rings, some more visible than others. And moons, so I could put that in. And, depending on its distance from the star, it could have liquid water on some of the moons, or frozen water. That of course will tie into what colors I may or may not use. Most of these stars are similar to our sun, so I know what colors to use. There are a handful that are red dwarfs, and those would affect the palette.

Q: TELL US ABOUT THE PAINTING YOU DID THAT WAS SEEN 'ROUND THE WORLD? 
A: Actually, there were two this year, first Upsilon Andromedae System and then Transit of HD 209458. Both of them made their way around the world via electronic media, not exactly with my permission. The Transit of HD 209458 generated so much traffic that it temporarily crashed my website. Obviously I was pleased by the publicity and public enthusiasm, but I haven't been compensated for the unauthorized uses and there have been numerous requests for gratis use as well. When you're a free-lancer, that matters.

Q: WHAT DO YOU LIKE MOST ABOUT YOUR WORK? 
A: Doing extrasolar planets is very rewarding because this is artwork that almost nobody else has done. This is something that can't be photographed and can't be seen close up. I feel like I'm contributing with my artwork in a unique fashion.

Q: WHAT FUTURE GOALS DO YOU HAVE?
A: There are a lot of planets I haven't painted yet, so I'm still trying to catch up. My goal is to paint them all. But they keep finding new planets. Those astronomers keep me on my toes. To see more of Lynette Cook's extraterrestrial artwork, check out her homepage at: extrasolar.spaceart.org  Karen Haber is an art journalist and columnist. She is also the author of eight science fiction novels including Woman without a Shadow and Star Trek Voyager: Bless the Beasts. Her short fiction has appeared in Asimov's, Fantasy and Science Fiction, and many anthologies. Her most recent short story, "The Fine Art of Betrayal," is part of the "Treachery and Treason" anthology edited by Laura Anne Gilman and Jennifer Heddle, to be published by ROC this Spring.

 

 


Stories

 

 


<oz.valueclick.com>